That “summit of retards at the White House” of which Rush Limbaugh spoke in his now infamous “satirical” comments last week included the families of people who, like Sarah Palin, have mentally disabled children. They aren’t laughing. But Gov. Sarah seems to think Rush’s tirade was funny, seeing as how she thinks it was satire.
Allow me to just spell this out as plainly as I can: Sarah Palin and Rush Limbaugh are not only political hacks, they are very twisted in their personal and family and political and yes, Christian and moral “values.” And they need to be called out at every turn for their blatantly mean-spirited stuff and the inconsistencies in their thinking–if you can call their kind of thought “thinking.” These are not thinking people.
That’s a harsh judgment, especially coming from a minister, but it’s an honest-to-God judgment thank you very much and here it stands.
Anyway, we’re posting a video as a lesson in real satire from one of the nation’s three reigning satirists, Steven Colbert of “Colbert Nation”–the other two being Jon Stewart and Letterman. We’re also posting a letter that was sent to Rush explaining why his “satirical” comments about “retards” were so misguided–and how he could have put his considerable influence to constructive use for disabled people.
(This 5-minute video does contain some rough language, BTW, even though it’s bleeped, and may not be for everyone. So just be warned, dear readers, especially if you’re new to this blog and have delicate sensibilities. We don’t shy away from the raw and the earthy and the downright edgy here.)
| The Colbert Report | Mon – Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c | |||
|
||||
Sorry, Palin supporters, but I just don’t see how Sarah Palin can defend Rush and dismiss his tirade that so blatantly diminishes people with disabilities to “satire,” while being so adamant for Rahm Emanuel’s head on a platter. No one can defend Emanuel, but the fact of the matter is that he has apologized and did meet with advocates and families at the meeting that Rush so (hilariously?) characterized as a “summit of retards.”
I hate that Sarah Palin has a special needs child, but that makes it all the more astounding that she would defend Rush Limbaugh’s hurtful attack on advocates of special needs children.
Enough already. Here’s the letter from Timothy Shriver, head of the Special Olympics who was part of that “retard summit” that Rush spoke of in his satire–the letter that, it seems to me, Sarah Palin should have written to Rush if she’s truly so offended by the use of the “r” word:
February 5, 2010
Mr. Rush Limbaugh
1270 Ave of The Americas, 9th Floor
NY, NY 10020
Dear Mr. Limbaugh:
I incredulously listened to the segment in your show in which you repeatedly and offensively used the term “retard” in reference to our meeting with White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel.
As a public figure, you have the great opportunity to influence the hearts and minds of millions of people in this country and around the world. People with intellectual disabilities – the largest group of people with disabilities in the world – have suffered generations of discrimination and humiliation. In the 21st century, they, together with their families and friends, are continuing their battle for the simplest form of justice: the justice that comes with a recognition of their full humanity. In their eyes and in the hearts of millions of others who love and care about them, language is important. So together, we have chosen to try to sensitize others to the pervasive but often ignored prejudice they suffer by asking for a change of language and a change of heart. For you or for anyone else to mock those who strive, often against long odds, for the recognition and respect they deserve, seems gratuitously hurtful and degrading.
Our message is as simple as it is powerful: people with intellectual disabilities are human beings. Gaining social recognition of that humanity continues to be an elusive goal for them and for those who love and care about them. For centuries, they have borne the stigma of institutionalization, sterilization, social isolation, and bigotry. The names associated with them – such as “retarded” and “retard” – have for too long been used as cruel taunts.
Despite the searing pain that this word (and others) has visited on millions, people with intellectual disabilities have nonetheless persevered to try to gain their dignity. For half a century, mothers, fathers, siblings, and people with intellectual disabilities have worked to open the eyes of the world to the simple truth that each of us has gifts. They do not deserve to be mocked by you.
Our “Spread the Word to End the Word” campaign is aimed at changing the perception that the R-word is acceptable and the good news is that the world is beginning to slowly change. Classrooms are becoming more tolerant, communities more accepting and the work place more inclusive as people with intellectual disabilities are slowly being seen for what we’ve always known them to be – people of value who help us all to understand we are each gifted in unique ways. But this change is too slow and each use of the R-word as a synonym for a stupid action, a schoolyard taunt, or the punch line of a joke, slows our progress immeasurably.
Great heroes like Special Olympics athlete Loretta Claiborne, are visiting school after school to explain that “retard” and “retarded” are words that caused them unbearable pain as children and continue to reflect deep misunderstanding today. Loretta has the courage to face her disability in public, to ask that others treat her with respect, and to ask for more sensitive and caring attitudes in the future. In response, many are joining her, Special Olympics, Best Buddies, and a coalition of organizations in asking children to pledge never to use the word again – not as a joke, not as a description of behavior, not as an epithet. In my own experience, when I ask people – be they first graders or media figures – to join in stopping the casual use of the word “retarded”, they universally agree to do so. Most want to go further: they want to understand better how they can serve as agents of acceptance and dignity.
Loretta is a role model and if given the chance to speak her mind on your program, she and many others like her would inspire you and your audience with her wisdom and toughness. This is a teachable moment. May I ask you to join her now by ending your use of this term and by further using your great influence and position to help others do the same?
Best wishes,
Timothy P. Shriver, Ph.D.
Chairman & CEO
